Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If Sotomayor and Kagan signed on to the opinion, one has to wonder about it's import. FadedMullet Jul 8 #1
My question, as well. LauraInLA Jul 8 #2
FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #14
Thank you! LauraInLA Jul 8 #15
Handing him the rope to hang himself? C_U_L8R Jul 8 #8
FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #13
No... it's a significant loss similar to restricting national injunctions FBaggins Jul 10 #20
I'm hopeful that some kindly, considerate coorporations will take over those ... chouchou Jul 8 #3
Trump wouldn't care. Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 8 #5
The issue they ruled on to me seems too general and ambiguous, however, rather general, I suspect more lostincalifornia Jul 8 #4
The rape of a nation by an experienced rapist. twodogsbarking Jul 8 #6
WaPo article says the two liberal Justices sided with the 6 pack because-- Silent Type Jul 8 #7
Yeah that's why I mentioned the "technicality" BumRushDaShow Jul 8 #9
SCOTUS is worthless angrychair Jul 8 #10
Sickening LymphocyteLover Jul 8 #11
My understanding is that it is actually a bit of a mixed decision. pat_k Jul 8 #12
Thank you. I think that you're right in your analysis of this and much closer to shortstop than left field. FadedMullet Jul 9 #18
Maybe it is this.............. DENVERPOPS Jul 8 #16
Damn, there's that word "mandate" again... slightlv Jul 8 #17
It hasn't for decades. Igel Jul 9 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court clears the ...»Reply #2