Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

DENVERPOPS

(13,003 posts)

16. Maybe it is this..............

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Jul 8, 2025, 11:01 PM

Jul 8

The Supremes know that there is no Judicial Branch in a tyrannical dictatorship.........Sooooo if they get in Trump's good graces, maybe they can make the case to Trump that along with the 2025 group, they need to throw out the old constitution and take YEARS to write and re-write their
"NEW" Constitution.........Job Security!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My bets are off on anything this Administration will do, or not do.........almost without exception they have overturned the rule of law, the constitution, the Federal Government, etc etc etc.......

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court clears the way for Trump's plans to downsize the federal workforce [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 8 OP

If Sotomayor and Kagan signed on to the opinion, one has to wonder about it's import. FadedMullet Jul 8 #1

My question, as well. LauraInLA Jul 8 #2

FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #14

Thank you! LauraInLA Jul 8 #15

Handing him the rope to hang himself? C_U_L8R Jul 8 #8

FWIW, my understanding in a post downthread. pat_k Jul 8 #13

No... it's a significant loss similar to restricting national injunctions FBaggins Jul 10 #20

I'm hopeful that some kindly, considerate coorporations will take over those ... chouchou Jul 8 #3

Trump wouldn't care. Prof. Toru Tanaka Jul 8 #5

The issue they ruled on to me seems too general and ambiguous, however, rather general, I suspect more lostincalifornia Jul 8 #4

The rape of a nation by an experienced rapist. twodogsbarking Jul 8 #6

WaPo article says the two liberal Justices sided with the 6 pack because-- Silent Type Jul 8 #7

Yeah that's why I mentioned the "technicality" BumRushDaShow Jul 8 #9

SCOTUS is worthless angrychair Jul 8 #10

Sickening LymphocyteLover Jul 8 #11

My understanding is that it is actually a bit of a mixed decision. pat_k Jul 8 #12

Thank you. I think that you're right in your analysis of this and much closer to shortstop than left field. FadedMullet Jul 9 #18

Maybe it is this.............. DENVERPOPS Jul 8 #16

Damn, there's that word "mandate" again... slightlv Jul 8 #17

It hasn't for decades. Igel Jul 9 #19