Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(159,209 posts)
5. It could be
Fri Jul 11, 2025, 09:47 AM
Jul 11

that since the first ruling here -

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html

was a typical 3-judge panel but then the next request was to do an en banc and had 10 of them there (the majority voted "no" ) -

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2025-06-13.html

then they might be considering THAT as the more "definitive" starting point date before the request for a retrial. The retrial reasoning was objecting to the "Access Hollywood" tapes - (per this - https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/federal-appeals-court-turn-down-trump-request-to-undo-e-jean-carroll-verdict/)

The latest (a reissue of their original ruling) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504.204.2.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»E. Jean Carroll Reacts to...»Reply #5