Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Buddyzbuddy

(1,805 posts)

21. Fully understood.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #18)

Wed Aug 13, 2025, 07:30 PM

Aug 13

But I would say that it's not so much his being at odds so much as it is her problem. I think she is in the minority on this one, for some reason. This administration has made it necessary for Democrats to become strategists that sometimes are not apparent in their strategy which can make it difficult to get support and create a cohesive organized plan.

Was my last statement filled with redundancy? It made sense when I was typing it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Chris Murphy goes all in on funding bill boycott as Dems seek bipartisanship [View all] BumRushDaShow Aug 13 OP

Chris would be correct. JBTaurus83 Aug 13 #1

I agree entirely with the last paragraph. Raven123 Aug 13 #2

So do I. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Aug 13 #3

He's right. BlueKota Aug 13 #4

We are the limp noodles Hornedfrog2000 Aug 13 #9

Their bipartisan bullshit will be the death of us. Autumn Aug 13 #5

But but Hornedfrog2000 Aug 13 #10

Not to forget sternly written letters... NEOH Aug 13 #14

He's right JustAnotherGen Aug 13 #6

Cooperation with tyranny Miguelito Loveless Aug 13 #7

Fighters vs Folders maspaha Aug 13 #8

Legislators are not prosecutors. That's the DOJ. maxsolomon Aug 13 #13

Nah Hornedfrog2000 Aug 13 #15

What about the GOP definition of bipartisanship don't Democrats get? Bipartisan, in their caucus, means Vinca Aug 13 #11

Cant blame republicans Hornedfrog2000 Aug 13 #16

Yay. It's about time really. He's spot on ... especially that last paragraph above. For all intents and purposes KPN Aug 13 #12

Spin, spin, spin Buddyzbuddy Aug 13 #17

"Connecticut senator is picking a battle that puts him at odds with his Democratic colleagues." BumRushDaShow Aug 13 #18

Fully understood. Buddyzbuddy Aug 13 #21

She is a ranking member on the Appropriations Committee that Murphy is on BumRushDaShow Aug 13 #22

I guess that's the benefit to Republicans having a dictator Buddyzbuddy Aug 14 #23

One of the issues with the Senate BumRushDaShow Aug 14 #24

That is a very good point. Buddyzbuddy Aug 14 #25

Any attempt at bipartisanship with a rattlesnake doesn't usually end well dlk Aug 13 #19

Being nice to bullies never works jgmiller Aug 13 #20

Until republicans in congress choie Aug 14 #26