Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]angrychair
(11,997 posts)53. So I would assume
That the US will have to return the tariff money because it was illegal. So who wants to bet that this administration refuses to do that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy [View all]
BumRushDaShow
5 hrs ago
OP
There is another law that allows a president to impose tariffs in an "emergency"
Fiendish Thingy
4 hrs ago
#13
Like other Republicans they aim more towards the middle of his cheeks and it involves their tongues more than their lips
cstanleytech
4 hrs ago
#7
So, they gave him the idea that he had immunity, and now it's their privilege to pull back
Baitball Blogger
4 hrs ago
#5
For Alito and Thomas to dissent is obvious, but for Kavanaugh to do so is really telling
Prairie Gates
4 hrs ago
#8
No surprise that the nazi enablers, alito, thomas, and kavanaugh disented. They don't believe in
lostincalifornia
4 hrs ago
#11
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court rules Trump doesn't have the tariff authority he claimed
LetMyPeopleVote
4 hrs ago
#33
Roberts delivered the opinion/judgment of the Court. Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent.🚨
riversedge
4 hrs ago
#35
Some tariffs were imposed because of 'attitude' of foreign leaders, or judicial actions of nations TSF
wiggs
3 hrs ago
#37
So is inventing law out of whole cloth an OFFICIAL duty of the president?
bucolic_frolic
3 hrs ago
#39
Lutnik and his sons (and other Wall Streeters) will make "astronomical sums" from this SC decision.
sop
3 hrs ago
#43
I honestly don't believe that the companies deserve to get much if any money back.
cstanleytech
3 hrs ago
#47
Trump should have to pay refunds out of his personal fortune to all of us.
Linda ladeewolf
3 hrs ago
#48
It looks like the politicsl hacks on this "court," if we call this arm of legal....
NNadir
2 hrs ago
#57
Trump will announce that SCOTUS is the deep state & should be dissolved, in 5, 4, 3, ...
aggiesal
2 hrs ago
#62