Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: SNAP Recipients Fight Back In Junk Food Crackdown [View all]Polybius
(21,868 posts)103. Ok, so we're in agreement
The other poster thinks it all should be covered. Post 79.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just give them the fucking money. They spend more money "discussing" it than it costs.
twodogsbarking
Mar 12
#2
It is, and always has been, about control, shaming, and, to a great degree, misogyny,
niyad
Mar 12
#11
My sympathies would revolve around a better understanding of "access food", "manage health conditions" and......
FadedMullet
Mar 12
#3
These rules would prevent a family from using SNAP to buy a birthday cake for their kids.
SunSeeker
Mar 12
#9
Did my post just get called ridiculous by someone claiming that "food is free"?
Oliver Bolliver Butt
Mar 13
#96
I'm not against junk food restrictions but I support an increase in the amount provided as eating healthy isn't cheap.
cstanleytech
Mar 12
#8
Many poor people lack kitchens in which to whip up those great recipes from scratch with all their helpful vitamins.
CTyankee
Mar 13
#54
This doesn't stop them from buying TV dinners and macaroni and cheese and other easy quick Foods
EX500rider
Mar 13
#64
As taxpayers we pick up a lot of people who have unhealthy life styles for a lot of different reasons.
CTyankee
6 hrs ago
#165
But we don't have to underwrite or contribute to those unhealthy life styles IMO
EX500rider
5 hrs ago
#166
Yes which is why produce is a good area to provide more money to spend on as you don't need to cook salads.
cstanleytech
Mar 13
#68
A great point. The issue is how we get such foods to those who need, but can't afford to buy, those food items.
CTyankee
Mar 13
#73
"The five plaintiffs--who live in Colorado, Iowa, Nebraska, Tennessee and West Virginia..."
BaronChocula
Mar 12
#10
Starting April 1, Texas also will ban SNAP purchases of many drinks that use artificial sweeteners.
Celerity
Mar 13
#55
That's an entirely different issue though but it's one that does need to be addressed urgently IMO.
cstanleytech
Mar 13
#69
I understand your point. I was thinking that the "Other sons-a-####"" would stop trashing the poor..
chouchou
Mar 13
#50
Unfortunately, your words are true. I keep hoping that mostly people are kind, fair and just.
chouchou
Mar 13
#58
Where does it say "fresh food"? It says no "candy and sugary drinks" That would leave tons of options..
EX500rider
Mar 13
#51
90 billion dollars the defense department wasted on lobster, crab and steak 🥩
questionseverything
Mar 13
#82
Sure there was some furniture, ice cream machines, musical instruments and
questionseverything
Mar 13
#92
I think a snickers or a Reeces has more protein than chips or pastries
questionseverything
Mar 13
#95
Most folks on snap have to supplement it with food pantry items or cash
questionseverything
Mar 13
#93
This is nothing more than the continaution of Ronald Reagan and the "welfare queen driving Cadillacs"
radicalleft
Mar 13
#91
Obviously you don't need to use the gas station/ convenience store grocery
questionseverything
Sunday
#128
Nothing is the way it was 20-30 years ago so spare me the " walked uphill in the snow " stories
questionseverything
Sunday
#130