Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. I've been a critic for 25 years, since I first walked into his gallery in Carmel. He was a scammer.
Sun Apr 8, 2012, 09:53 PM
Apr 2012

Far worse than a commercial artist, hell, you have to make a living...

And it's said that one in twenty homes in America has a Kinkade print or something, somewhere-- it's pretty scenery, why not?

He was a scammer.

He perfected a way of selling very convincing prints as original art.

How, by running high quality prints on special textured stock, and then having "skilled craftsmen" add stipples of color, points of light (as it were).

These "originals" (prints with stipples) are sold as originals for thousands of dollars while ordinary actual prints, called "prints" are sold with prices in the hundreds.

Unknowing people walk into galleries and think they are buying actual Thomas Kinkade original paintings when they're just prints.

And that makes me angry and it cheapens the art world.

RIP, blessings on his family.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Artists»Thomas Kinkade: 'Painter ...»Reply #1