Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Indiana

Showing Original Post only (View all)

TexasTowelie

(121,941 posts)
Sun Nov 4, 2018, 04:19 AM Nov 2018

Public pensions not at risk if Hoosiers ratify balanced budget amendment to Indiana Constitution [View all]

INDIANAPOLIS — Former state Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek, isn't running for office this year, but lately he's been spending a lot of time knocking down misconceptions about a ballot question that he helped put before Hoosier voters.

Public Question 1 is a proposed addition to the Indiana Constitution that would mandate the General Assembly enact a balanced budget that funds the state's pension obligations and also does not spend more than the state is projected to collect in tax revenue.

That's already been the practice for many years in Indiana — regardless of which political party controlled the House, Senate or governor's office — even though it's not explicitly required by the constitution.

But Hershman contends that putting the mandate in the constitution will "ensure Indiana's legacy of fiscal responsibility benefits future generations."

Read more: https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/public-pensions-not-at-risk-if-hoosiers-ratify-balanced-budget/article_6a421cfe-c98c-5129-9c6a-21758731282e.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Indiana»Public pensions not at ri...»Reply #0