Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,183 posts)
5. Thanks. I generally don't look seriously at this marketing crap other than to point out...
Fri Jun 27, 2025, 02:09 PM
Jun 27

...that it is no different than the last 50 years of fossil fuel greenwashing marketing crap.

I therefore didn't pick up just how lazily rote and mass produced this these ads are.

There are, i would guess, thousands of solar-to-hydrogen papers published each year most of which are not worth reading, but I do keep in my files some of them, the thermochemical cycle types since they can me interesting if one is agnostic about the source of primary energy. I suspect that many solar thermochemical papers are written by people who understand the economic and environmental unsuitability of solar heat schemes, but chose the heat source to be solar to improve their odds of their grant application being accepted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"Hydrogen Just Got Cheape...»Reply #5