David Chandler 9/11 Interview in Eugene OR

[William Seger]

4. I loved how he talked about Rachel calling "truthers" loonytoons, too

... because then he said, "It was so infuriating to me because there is a very solid scientific core to the 9/11 truth movement" -- thereby proving Rachel's point, since he just spent the first half of the video trying to claim that his own obdurate self-delusions are part of that "very solid scientific core," despite being based on profound ignorance of things like structural mechanics and dynamic loading and common sense. This is a "scientist" who wants so much to believe that the buildings were brought down by explosives that he has apparently convinced himself that magical silent explosives exist, and that the "perps" were so proud of this amazing scientific achievement that they used about a 100 times more of it than was necessary to bring down the building, just to pointlessly pulverize concrete and hurl steel members away from the building. This is a "scientist" whose controlled demolition theory doesn't explain why the first seven feet of WTC 7's fall was not at free-fall, whereas the NIST theory does explain it, so he simply ignores that fact and lies about the free-fall being "right from the start," even though his own measurements show otherwise, and then accuses NIST of being deceptive.

I also loved his theory that idiotic nonsense like the "no-plane" bullshit was planted by the bad guys to make the "truth movement" look like a bunch of loonytoons, as if they need any help with that.