Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
2. Scoring system reflects modern military
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:25 AM
Apr 2013
"scoring scheme that prioritized protection above all, followed by firepower, mobility, and passenger capacity, in that order,"

This is why the British are reluctant to fight with American forces in Afghanistan and German forces flatly refuse to do so. American forces place "force protection" as a priority over accomplishing the mission. They are so unwilling to take casualities that they will not attack a building, but will sit back and call in artillery or air strikes, even when they know that noncombatants are in the building. Britain, and even nore so Germany, find that objectional, since it violates several provisions of the Geneva Conventions for the conduct of war.

If our military placed the mission as priority, as we did in the wars we used to win, the scoring for the Ground Combat vehicle should be mobility first, then firepower, protection and capacity. in that order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it would be wise Sherman A1 Apr 2013 #1
Scoring system reflects modern military JayhawkSD Apr 2013 #2
Is there any doubt the GCV's actual production cost would double? bluedigger Apr 2013 #3
Keep Lima open era veteran Apr 2013 #4
I had a mechanized platoon when I was in Iraq Victor_c3 Apr 2013 #5
Love your pic. unhappycamper Apr 2013 #6
Thanks Victor_c3 Apr 2013 #7
Great Image era veteran Apr 2013 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»CBO To Army: Scrap Ground...»Reply #2