Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Two views on theism: [View all]MineralMan
(150,089 posts)82. What appears to be happening is a version of "proof-texting"
        that uses non-religious texts. By cherry-picking individual quotations, one can try to make a particular point. It's in common use by apologists through mining of scriptural quotations. Here, we're seeing it used in the same way, but by mining quotations from famous people.
As your quote from Einstein indicates, his opinion was similar to Russell's. Perhaps not as well expressed, but almost the same.
Both men produced a large body of work, which provides a rich source of quotes to be used in "proof-texting," I suppose.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							108 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        One is self-righteous and the other humble. These attitudes can be held by theists and atheists.
        Doodley
        Nov 2018
        #7
      
        
        Personally, I believe religion is but a warped interpretation/expression of humility.
        Comatose Sphagetti
        Nov 2018
        #11
      
        
        Undoubtedly your canned responses are so deep intellectually nobody else could understand
        Major Nikon
        Nov 2018
        #63
      
        
        We can also disagree that it's unproveable and still share progressive politics nt
        marylandblue
        Nov 2018
        #26
      
        
        It is publicly expressed contempt and it leads and is intended to lead to intolerance.
        guillaumeb
        Nov 2018
        #59
      
        
        Another example of conflating an attack on a belief as an attack of a person
        Major Nikon
        Nov 2018
        #72