Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,922 posts)
9. But not priests because they are specifically exempted
Thu Nov 21, 2019, 05:41 PM
Nov 2019

At least in most states. And we know this is a recipe for insuring the child rapes and cover ups will benefit from this exemption because experts like prosecutors and child welfare advocacy organizations are telling us this. But some are still "unsure" and instead want to parrot out the RCC's own position on why that's a bad idea, because after all nobody really knows as much about child rape as the RCC. And the reason nobody knows as much about it is because the RCC won't release all their records going back decades with thousands of cases of members of their organization raping children and institutionalized cover ups and shielding rapists from prosecution in dozens of different ways. It's really more accurate to say nobody knows more about covering up child rape than the RCC because they simply have far more experience doing it.

The reason the RCC spends millions of dollars lobbying against secular accountability is pretty clear to anyone north of a room temperature IQ. But some are still "unsure" about it because of the exact same talking points the RCC is using as if everyone is just too stupid not to see through the child rape apologia.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Victims, reports say boar...»Reply #9