Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(56,010 posts)
3. No. All AI art is based on theft of real creators' work. And anyone claiming to be creative using AI
Sun Aug 18, 2024, 03:47 PM
Aug 2024

is just someone who typed in a few words as a prompt and probably discarded lots of much-worse AI results before getting one that looked halfway decent.

Zero talent being displayed, minimal creativity (the creativity is in actual creation, not a minimal suggestion of a variation), contempt for the real artists being ripped off (AI artists are well aware how real creators feel about having their work stolen), and devaluing of art overall, with the AI companies that stole all that intellectual property wanting to control it, to sell mimicry of real creativity to businesses happy to replace real artists with cheaper AI, even if it's vastly inferior to real art. There are also businesses now offering much less compensation to real artists with the threat that they'll be replaced by AI if they don't accept much lower pay.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Movies»What would The Fifth Eler...»Reply #3