General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: At some point, young voters "broke bad" and turned on older voters. Maybe they didn't mean to hurt us. But, they did. [View all]meadowlander
(4,942 posts)If he does blame Thatcher on boomers, it's so fleeting I can't be bothered to watch a 45 minute video again to find it. He notes in a few places how Thatcherism can be observed in demographic trends but he doesn't at length blame Thatcher on a particular generation or even say that she is singularly responsible for all of the inequalities he is discussing.
His point is that the size of the Boomer cohort meant that for decades they were able to have an outsized influence on social policy and that that outsized influence has been used to skew a number of things in their favour while pulling up the ladder behind them. Whether this was driven primarily by the Silent Generation, the Boomers or both is beside the point.
The truth is that people born after the mid-70s in America will be the first generations in modern history that will have to make do with less than their parents did. And there are a number of things contributing to that but a big part of it is unsustainable choices made by the two or so generations before them - the ones that have known about climate change since the 70s but taken (as a cohort) virtually no substantial efforts to alter their consumption patterns in order not to burden their children and grandchildren with the costs of mitigation and adaptation.
Also the ones who allowed labour rights to erode so that young people make less in real terms and no longer have protected defined benefit employer pension schemes. Also the ones who see property investment as a vehicle to make money and not as driving up the cost of housing for people who need a house to live in. Also the ones who (again as a cohort) have accepted austerity arguments and supported tax cuts and benefits cuts that transfer wealth to a smaller and smaller percentage of the population. Also the ones who have voted against school funding levies once their kids were through or are keen for vouchers to defund public education so they can send their kids and grandkids to private or charter schools. Also the ones who didn't want to pay taxes to build and maintain appropriate infrastructure for sustainable urban growth so that their kids could afford homes with less than an hour commute to work. Also the ones who cheerfully packed landfills with single use plastics, styrofoam containers, electronics with planned obsolescence, and so on with no plan whatsoever other than "somebody down the road will deal with this mess but we'll be long dead by then".
We don't get out of that by blaming kids for "breaking bad" and not upholding their end of the social contract by happily continuing to fund Medicare and Medicaid which they will potentially never receive themselves. The social contract goes both ways and I don't think you can seriously argue that we are handing our kids and grandkids a world in a better state than it was when we found it. That's not to say that individuals haven't tried their best, but as a whole you can't deny the backsliding, collective lethargy and willful self-delusion across a slew of indicators.
Edit history
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):