Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,081 posts)
31. Not exactly correct.
Mon Sep 22, 2025, 10:54 AM
Sep 22

There were actually 2 separate resolutions (not bills) pass by the Senate relating to Charlie Kirk. The first passed early last week denounced political violence and stated a couple (mostly) non-conroversial things about Kirk = that he was a devoted father, that he founded Turning Point USA and that he engaged in open debates with students on college campuses. It resolved to condemn the assassination and express condolences and sympathies to his family.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-resolution/391/text

RESOLUTION
Condemning the assassination of Charlie Kirk and honoring his life and legacy.

Whereas Charlie Kirk was horrifically assassinated on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University while speaking to a large group of college students;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was a devoted husband, father, and Christian;

Whereas, in 2012, Charlie Kirk founded Turning Point USA, a conservative campus advocacy group that quickly became one of the fastest growing college campus chapter organizations in the country; and

Whereas Charlie Kirk frequently engaged college students of all political backgrounds in open debates and discussion, encouraging civil discourse on college campuses and among college students: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate—

(1) condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk in the strongest possible terms;

(2) extends its deepest condolences and sympathies to Charlie Kirk’s family, including his wife, Erika, and their two young children; and

(3) honors Charlie Kirk’s commitment to the constitutional principles of civil discussion and debate between all people of the United States, regardless of political affiliation.

This also passed the Senate by unanimous consent though I'm not sure exactly when or who was in the Senate at the time. Democrats really shouldn't have had a major issue with this one.

Then on Thursday at 1:15, Rick Scott introduced the resolution to declare October 14, 2025 "A Day of remembrance for Charlie Kirk". This was the one that caused controversy in part because the media conflated it with the resolution the House voted on on Friday. Rick Scott's resolution is here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-resolution/403/text#:~:text=S.-,Res.,of%20Remembrance%20for%20Charlie%20Kirk%22.
RESOLUTION
Expressing support for the designation of October 14, 2025, as the “National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk”.

Whereas Charlie Kirk was a champion of free speech, civil dialogue, and faith;

Whereas Mr. Kirk consistently promoted the values of individual liberty, open debate, the importance of civic engagement, and the defense of constitutional principles;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was recognized as one of the leading voices among young leaders in the United States, creating opportunities for civic education, fostering youth leadership, and promoting principles of liberty and democracy across the United States;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was the founder and executive director of Turning Point USA, a nonprofit organization of thousands of chapters across the United States dedicated to educating students about the principles of freedom, free markets, and limited government;

Whereas Charlie Kirk authored multiple national best-selling books, that engage readers in critical conversations about civics, culture, and the future of the United States;

Whereas, through Mr. Kirk's writing, public speaking, and media presence, Charlie Kirk reached millions of United States citizens, inspiring the next generation to become active participants in civic life;

Whereas Mr. Kirk's life’s work has contributed to strengthening public discourse, defending constitutional principles, and fostering active citizenship; and

Whereas Mr. Kirk's life work, especially his efforts to bring these American ideals to life on college campuses in the United States, cost him his life by means of an assassin's bullet on September 10, 2025: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate—

(1) supports the designation of October 14, 2025, as the “National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk”;

(2) recognizes Charlie Kirk for his contributions to civic education and public service; and

(3) encourages educational institutions, civic organizations, and citizens across the United States to observe this day with appropriate programs, activities, prayers, and ceremonies that promote civic engagement and the principles of faith, liberty, and democracy that Charlie Kirk championed.

The House resolution did not include the day of remembrance but did include objectionable praise for Kirk. That is why 118 Democrats voted against this:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/719/text
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
September 19, 2025.

Whereas Charles “Charlie” James Kirk, born October 14, 1993, was a courageous American patriot, whose life was tragically and unjustly cut short in an act of political violence on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was a devoted Christian, who boldly lived out his faith with conviction, courage, and compassion;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was a dedicated husband to his beloved wife, Erika Kirk, and a loving father to their daughter and son, exemplifying the virtues of faith, fidelity, and fatherhood;

Whereas Charlie Kirk was a fierce defender of the American founding and its timeless principles of life, liberty, limited government, and individual responsibility;

Whereas Charlie Kirk, at 18 years old, founded Turning Point USA in 2012, a student movement with the mission to “identify, educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government”;

Whereas Charlie Kirk became one of the most prominent voices in America, engaging in respectful, civil discourse across college campuses, media platforms, and national forums, always seeking to elevate truth, foster understanding, and strengthen the Republic;

Whereas Charlie Kirk personified the values of the First Amendment, exercising his God-given right to speak freely, challenge prevailing narratives, and did so with honor, courage, and respect for his fellow Americans;

Whereas Charlie Kirk’s commitment to civil discussion and debate stood as a model for young Americans across the political spectrum, and he worked tirelessly to promote unity without compromising on conviction;

Whereas the assassination of Charlie Kirk was not only a heinous act of violence, but a sobering reminder of the growing threat posed by political extremism and hatred in our society;

Whereas such acts of politically motivated violence are antithetical to the principles of a free republic, in which differences of opinion are to be debated—not silenced—with civility, reason, and mutual respect;

Whereas the rise in targeted violence against individuals for their political beliefs undermines the very fabric of our constitutional democracy and chills the free exchange of ideas essential to a healthy civic society;

Whereas leaders at every level—government, education, media, and beyond—must stand united in unequivocal condemnation of political violence, regardless of their ideology;

Whereas the tragic loss of Charlie Kirk must not be allowed to deepen the divides in our Nation, but instead serve as a turning point to recommit ourselves to better angels, and to the timeless American principles of liberty governed by truth and the virtues of peaceful dialogue; and

Whereas Charlie Kirk would not have us respond to his death with despair, but rather with renewed purpose—to speak truth with courage, to stand firm in faith, to seek unity while standing firm in principle, and to serve as living reminders of the values he championed: faith, family, and freedom: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) condemns in the strongest possible terms the assassination of Charles “Charlie” James Kirk, and all forms of political violence;

(2) commends and honors the dedicated law enforcement and emergency personnel for their tireless efforts in finding the suspect responsible for the assassination of Charlie Kirk and urges the administration of swift justice to the suspect;

(3) extends its deepest condolences and sympathies to Charlie Kirk’s family, including his wife, Erika, and their two young children, and prays for comfort, peace, and healing in this time of unspeakable loss;

(4) honors the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk, whose steadfast dedication to the Constitution, civil discourse, and Biblical truth inspired a generation to cherish and defend the blessings of liberty; and

(5) calls upon all Americans—regardless of race, party affiliation, or creed—to reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for explaining what happened. Bob in the Land Sep 22 #1
Ditto this... Alice B. Sep 22 #17
I love it when anyone admits something like Cha Sep 22 #39
Yup *blush* Alice B. Sep 22 #42
I think you did Good! Cha Sep 22 #44
Thank you! Alice B. Sep 23 #46
Thank you for this explanation. I couldn't imagine that Dem senators would vote for, Ocelot II Sep 22 #2
Have the Democrats ever pulled this sweet trick? leftstreet Sep 22 #3
Chuck Schumer used the rare "standing hold on unanimous consent" procedure, as well as blue slip holds lapucelle Sep 22 #7
keeping in mind that humans are fallible, and some more than others, i suggest a simpler explanation unblock Sep 22 #4
Perhaps, but Tuberville has a solid record of devious procedural moves. lapucelle Sep 22 #8
That's not devious. Obnoxious, certainly, but not devious unblock Sep 22 #22
Tuberville "not devious"... Ha! Cha Sep 22 #41
oddly, though, what's an official senate meeting if there's not a quorum? unblock Sep 22 #5
I would imagine that the Senate is in session whenever it's stated on the calendar. lapucelle Sep 22 #38
The article implies there were no dems there unblock Sep 22 #40
The session is on the Senate calendar. N/T lapucelle Sep 23 #45
(Edited) We should verify in the CR about who voted rather than speculate LearnedHand Sep 22 #6
Stop it. Neither Senator Kelly nor Senator Gallegos co-sponsored the resolution. lapucelle Sep 22 #10
Oh you're exactly right and I was looking at the wrong Senate Resolution LearnedHand Sep 22 #13
There were no votes to be recorded Fiendish Thingy Sep 22 #12
The CR will never list the votes because there was no roll call. lapucelle Sep 22 #14
There is no record of a roll call vote because there was no roll call vote. lapucelle Sep 22 #16
If you want to verify by the Congressional Record, here is what the Congressional Record states. lapucelle Sep 22 #18
The Congressional Record does not record who was present Wiz Imp Sep 22 #23
I am a little confused. Katinfl Sep 22 #9
Officially? No, although on October 14, 2025 right wingers will be commemorating. N/T lapucelle Sep 22 #15
The Senate passed resolution declares October 14, 2025 A Day of Remembrance Wiz Imp Sep 22 #25
Thanks for the clarification. Katinfl Sep 22 #28
Yeah, but some clickbait video said "UNANIMOUSLY" in all caps Fiendish Thingy Sep 22 #11
Don't blame this on videos. In fact I don't recall seeing videos declaring this at all. Wiz Imp Sep 22 #27
I think it's worth pointing out the difference between passing unanimously and unanimous consent, but the rest of this tritsofme Sep 22 #19
This was a controversial resolution, and there are folks having a field day with anti-Democratic Party messaging lapucelle Sep 22 #20
This might be the only place it is controversial. tritsofme Sep 22 #21
That's a fair point, but facts are the best ammunition in pushing back lapucelle Sep 22 #24
I believe the Democrats in the Senate Prairie_Seagull Sep 22 #26
That was the House resolution. It was different from the Senate resolution. lapucelle Sep 22 #29
Thanks lapucelle. Prairie_Seagull Sep 22 #30
Not exactly correct. Wiz Imp Sep 22 #31
Thanks Wiz Imp. nt Prairie_Seagull Sep 22 #34
Will there be a public execution for the suspect soon? twodogsbarking Sep 22 #32
At the 46 second mark of this video is the Senate when Tuberville calls for Wiz Imp Sep 22 #33
It sounds like one freaking voice --- Rick Scott's. lapucelle Sep 22 #35
I so appreciate your efforts to set the record straight mcar Sep 22 #36
Thanks. I think Wiz Imp came up with the best receipt of all... lapucelle Sep 22 #37
lol.. ".. the best receipt of all.. " Cha Sep 22 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What exactly happened in ...»Reply #31