Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What exactly happened in the Senate with the Charlie Kirk Day resolution [View all]Cha
(315,426 posts)44. I think you did Good!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What exactly happened in the Senate with the Charlie Kirk Day resolution [View all]
lapucelle
Sep 22
OP
Thank you for this explanation. I couldn't imagine that Dem senators would vote for,
Ocelot II
Sep 22
#2
Chuck Schumer used the rare "standing hold on unanimous consent" procedure, as well as blue slip holds
lapucelle
Sep 22
#7
keeping in mind that humans are fallible, and some more than others, i suggest a simpler explanation
unblock
Sep 22
#4
I would imagine that the Senate is in session whenever it's stated on the calendar.
lapucelle
Sep 22
#38
Stop it. Neither Senator Kelly nor Senator Gallegos co-sponsored the resolution.
lapucelle
Sep 22
#10
If you want to verify by the Congressional Record, here is what the Congressional Record states.
lapucelle
Sep 22
#18
Officially? No, although on October 14, 2025 right wingers will be commemorating. N/T
lapucelle
Sep 22
#15
Don't blame this on videos. In fact I don't recall seeing videos declaring this at all.
Wiz Imp
Sep 22
#27
I think it's worth pointing out the difference between passing unanimously and unanimous consent, but the rest of this
tritsofme
Sep 22
#19