Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(1,349 posts)
2. It depends on what can be proven or at least plausible
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 01:41 PM
Wednesday

There's no path that must be taken based on what's been released so far. Especially with things being released without context, it's hard to know how any given thing has been investigated.

It's a giant jigsaw puzzle and we have a bunch of pieces, including some that aren't relevant to the outcome. Take the pictures of random celebrities or politicians at an Epstein event. That doesn't say anything about if they abused kids.

I think the most probable next step will be moving forward judicially to get the full files released. But then still it will take a long time to sort through. You'd need forensic accountants, flight logs, etc to make a case against anyone.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hate to ask but..... (r...»Reply #2