Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(156,687 posts)
Mon Jun 23, 2025, 04:53 PM Jun 23

Supreme Court allows Trump to restart swift deportation of migrants away from their home countries [View all]

Last edited Mon Jun 23, 2025, 06:49 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: AP

Updated 6:28 PM EDT, June 23, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.

The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices joined a scathing dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The court action came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan, though they later diverted to an American naval base in Djibouti after a judge stepped in.

The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. Immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump’s administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.

In her 19-page dissent, Sotomayor wrote that the court’s action exposes “thousands to the risk of torture or death” and gives the Trump administration a win despite earlier violating the lower court’s order.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immigration-trump-south-sudan-c7ffbbcede3158a3352b2dbf4439780a



Just breaking. Short article at original post time.

Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf


Article updated.

Previous articles -

Updated 5:42 PM EDT, June 23, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.

The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented. It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan, though they later diverted to a U.S. naval base in Djibouti after a judge stepped in.

The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. Immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump's administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.

In a scathing 19-page dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court's action exposes "thousands to the risk of torture or death."



Updated 5:04 PM EDT, June 23, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations. The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented from the order.

It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found that violated his court order giving people a chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent away from their home countries.

The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries.

After Murphy stepped in, authorities landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.



Updated 4:57 PM EDT, June 23, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.

The high court majority did not detail its reasoning in the brief order, as is typical on its emergency docket. All three liberal justices dissented from the order.

It came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May. U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found that violated his court order giving people a chance to argue they could be in danger of torture if sent away from their home countries.

The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries. Authorities instead landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.



Original article -

Updated 4:45 PM EDT, June 23, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to restart swift removals of migrants to countries other than their homelands on Monday, lifting for now a court order requiring they get a chance to challenge the deportations.

The high court's action came after immigration officials put eight people on a plane to South Sudan in May, a move that U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found violated his order. The migrants from countries including Myanmar, Vietnam and Cuba had been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. and immigration officials have said that they were unable to return them quickly to their home countries.

Authorities instead landed the plane at a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the migrants were housed in a converted shipping container and the officers guarding them faced rough conditions even as immigration attorneys waited for word from their clients.

The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by Republican President Donald Trump's administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The SC is such fucking trash. IF you're going to indiscriminately deport people, the LEAST you can do is send them to Karasu Jun 23 #1
Unless they left because they might be killed, maybe. If... littlemissmartypants Jun 24 #24
I agree, though I doubt this regime would give that possibility so much as a second thought. Karasu Jun 24 #25
This regime... littlemissmartypants Jun 24 #28
That's being too kind!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 24 #26
I sure hope not. I despise the SC with a passion. LOL Karasu Jun 24 #31
Hahaha, yeah me too!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 24 #32
Guess they will never be able to remove the red hats that are stuck to their heads. twodogsbarking Jun 23 #2
Of course not. ... littlemissmartypants Jun 24 #29
The fix is in JoseBalow Jun 23 #3
Law means nothing to the kacekwl Jun 23 #10
Post removed Post removed Jun 23 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Marthe48 Jun 23 #6
One paragraph ruling - almost 20 page dissent by Sotomayor FBaggins Jun 23 #5
Cruel, vicious shithole country. Solly Mack Jun 23 #7
Secretive, harsh, and arbitrary Star Chamber Ponietz Jun 23 #8
The courts are not holding anymore fujiyamasan Jun 23 #9
they're already being chipped away... slightlv Jun 23 #16
100%, the SC disgusts me... but then look who put the majority in place!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 24 #27
The USA is no longer a civilized country. North Coast Lawyer Jun 23 #11
and richest "shit hole country"... those most of us don't share in those riches. slightlv Jun 23 #17
Monsters. Every Republican is a monster. travelingthrulife Jun 23 #12
5-4 or 6-3? Polybius Jun 23 #13
I had to look in the ruling - it's 6 - 3 BumRushDaShow Jun 23 #14
what an inhumane decision.. mountain grammy Jun 23 #15
They might as well just go ahead and shoot them here, Bayard Jun 23 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Bayard Jun 23 #19
Horrific. No words. 58Sunliner Jun 23 #20
The shadow docket Picaro Jun 23 #21
There's that rubber stamp I knew they had. LudwigPastorius Jun 24 #22
The UNmagnificent 6 are 100% complicit in this evil that has engulfed our country. Initech Jun 24 #23
Disgusting but not surprising. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Jun 24 #30
Pro life zealots should not be judges perdita9 Jun 24 #33
The supreme court bernieb Jun 24 #34
The visa restrictions on many countries announced last week or the week before somsai Jun 24 #35
More Supreme Court, SHAME. IMO republianmushroom Jun 24 #36
WOW! Be ready forn many more decisions like this one. bluestarone Jun 24 #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows Trum...